Author Topic: Chronology 2  (Read 18293 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Madmax

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 1024
  • Pizzaboy
    • View Profile
Chronology 2
« Reply #60 on: November 08, 2005, 02:08:04 PM »
Quote
Why can't people accept a Packer on a roof? <_<
because you can't do it in an unmodded version of VC (most of the time) anyways this thread is about C2 and not this...This issue has been discussed previously and this isn't the place for it

Offline Lord Peres

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 764
    • View Profile
    • http://
Chronology 2
« Reply #61 on: November 08, 2005, 02:20:00 PM »
Quote
Quote


No offence MadMax, but the stoppie2grind with the PB @ 7:33, can that packer get up that roof in a natural way?
I believe I saw you using a spawned packer in another ATS-vid in a PB-roofstunt in Downtown.
Since a few members think it's modding (well, not legit/useable in a vid) I'd like to hear your point of view. PM me if you don't want to get off-topic.
 
no Its ok so everyone knows. I did get them up the natural way. Its hard but possible. Use another packer ;) One you get on your bike hopefully the packer which is no longer useful dissapears ;)
Haha dude download Nitzkit's vid, he remembered us how did you get the packer on this roof :D


This vid: http://www.tgahq.com/?do=dynamic&id=2828 ;)  
« Last Edit: November 08, 2005, 02:21:07 PM by Lord_Peres »

Offline kaneda

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 2338
    • View Profile
    • @pump_upp - best crypto pumps on telegram !
Chronology 2
« Reply #62 on: November 08, 2005, 02:27:14 PM »
Bugger...Solaris is right, Hagz's grab WAS in Havoc. Apologies for that one people...I was positive it was No Mercy.

But I don't think there was a single stunt that was also in C1...anyone who can prove me wrong, it'd be appreciated.



Thanks for the replies so far too lads. And I see my note regarding Filefront complaints STILL fell on deaf ears (or eyes...whatever).  <_<  

Offline Psycho

  • Insomniac.
  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 3078
  • <_<
    • View Profile
Chronology 2
« Reply #63 on: November 08, 2005, 02:27:59 PM »
i didnt have to wait at all for filefront, will edit with review

Offline Turtle Dick

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 8607
    • View Profile
Chronology 2
« Reply #64 on: November 08, 2005, 02:29:14 PM »
Nice vid guys ;)

Although the song was really poo, kaneda made it go well with the vid. The stunts were really carefully selected from the other vids, and some of them were new to me. I need to watch Hagz' old vids :P

Can't wait to see Chronology III, good job! :grin:  

Offline Solaris

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 1741
  • ...
    • View Profile
Chronology 2
« Reply #65 on: November 08, 2005, 02:46:54 PM »
Another problem:

Neo's packerbump2billboard stunt (3:10) says to be in Overdrive.

Hagz's packer2grind stunt (3:59) says to be in Overdrive too, only it has Hagz's name written on the clip. Neo's stunt didn't.

This MIGHT be a mistake - I don't know. Just something I noticed.

Offline Liviu

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 3246
    • View Profile
    • http://www.dota-allstars.com
Chronology 2
« Reply #66 on: November 08, 2005, 02:57:38 PM »
Very nice vid,i still think C1 was better,but probably because of the music.

Stunts: As usual 10/10 some of the best stunts ever,i liked every one( 4:50 stunt was kewl,only Nitzkit's huge head showing  :lol: )

Editing: Very good aswell,with a lot of effects but NOT overdone, 10/10

Music: It was at the same time wierd but ok for  the vid 8/10

So in the end yeah,9/10 for yet another kickass vid,can't wait for C3 :)

Offline bj070893

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 3803
    • View Profile
    • http://www.barbie.com/
Chronology 2
« Reply #67 on: November 08, 2005, 03:06:10 PM »
Quote
Bugger...Solaris is right, Hagz's grab WAS in Havoc. Apologies for that one people...I was positive it was No Mercy.

But I don't think there was a single stunt that was also in C1...anyone who can prove me wrong, it'd be appreciated.



Thanks for the replies so far too lads. And I see my note regarding Filefront complaints STILL fell on deaf ears (or eyes...whatever).  <_<
Again, sorry. I merely said that this video would be worth the wait in the queue. It wasn't at all a complaint about Filefront.

Offline Fugitive

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 4883
    • View Profile
    • http://www.fugitivesplace.3x.ro
Chronology 2
« Reply #68 on: November 08, 2005, 04:19:40 PM »
The comments looks good. Downloading. I can't wait to see an ATS vid. :grin:  
« Last Edit: November 08, 2005, 04:20:05 PM by fugitive »

Offline Dannye

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 3580
    • View Profile
Chronology 2
« Reply #69 on: November 08, 2005, 04:37:57 PM »
Just watched it and it was great stuff!!

Editing was perfect for the vid, and i felt the music went really well with it.

Stunts were very nice to see again. Great to see some new angles on some of them, and also good to see some of them 'smoothly' (ie. Nitzkit's LC airtogrind at 1:30 - it was nice to see that properly. So good work on somehow fixing the replaylag issues that were apparent in the velocity version). Although i reckon it would've been nice to see some more 'older' stunts from all of you (not just GTAF), but i guess you had alot of the oldies in C1 so thats okay.

Yeah great vid, cant wait for more!!
« Last Edit: November 08, 2005, 04:39:01 PM by Dannye »

Offline Psycho

  • Insomniac.
  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 3078
  • <_<
    • View Profile
Chronology 2
« Reply #70 on: November 08, 2005, 04:38:46 PM »
Quote
Another problem:

Neo's packerbump2billboard stunt (3:10) says to be in Overdrive.

Hagz's packer2grind stunt (3:59) says to be in Overdrive too, only it has Hagz's name written on the clip. Neo's stunt didn't.

This MIGHT be a mistake - I don't know. Just something I noticed.
i think ALL of hagz stunts had his name on them
dunno y, but w/e

yeah this vid was awesome! you picked out the best stunts, and fixed them with the music, andi didnt see anything that wasnt good...A++

Offline Dannye

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 3580
    • View Profile
Chronology 2
« Reply #71 on: November 08, 2005, 04:40:19 PM »
Quote

i think ALL of hagz stunts had his name on them
dunno y, but w/e

Hagz's stunts had his name on them because they were clips straight from his older vids (which had his name on them), unlike most of the other stunts in which the reps were kept and re-recorded for this vid.
« Last Edit: November 08, 2005, 04:41:21 PM by Dannye »

Offline Psycho

  • Insomniac.
  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 3078
  • <_<
    • View Profile
Chronology 2
« Reply #72 on: November 08, 2005, 06:05:58 PM »
i see

Offline Barney

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 4935
  • Adebisi's Hat
    • View Profile
Chronology 2
« Reply #73 on: November 08, 2005, 08:59:48 PM »
better than the first. Was entertaining.

Offline Daffy

  • V.I.P. Member
  • Posts: 13506
  • WH & NU Founder
    • View Profile
Chronology 2
« Reply #74 on: November 08, 2005, 11:33:36 PM »
The song was a bit too long, the editing was ok but there wasn't like any sick effects... just Gradient Map and TV Simulator thingys but it was ok.
The stunts was good and the movie contains a little part of the stunting history.
Enjoyable :)

 

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal