0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Hi, guys. Where I can find LCiVC with stunting .scm?? Please give me link of your gta. Thank you.
Quote from: GTAFnatic on January 15, 2017, 08:58:37 AMHi, guys. Where I can find LCiVC with stunting .scm?? Please give me link of your gta. Thank you. http://www.mediafire.com/file/iy7ovse6ggkbh4a/GTA+LC.7z
https://www.sendspace.com/file/38vlxc
Big V: I've had far too many similar run-ups; shitty light post and obstacles. A simple tap to realign the bike into a grind is beautiful; it makes the twist seem seamless. An underestimated alternative to bumps.Blaze: I've always seen eye-to-eye with you, despite you actually getting shit done in videos. Maybe not the most creative of stunts but didn't stand out negatively, which (on my level) would be considered a win.FFace: Amount of times I've wanted to do shit with that rail. It's still one of the areas I associate with you; where I imported my first taxi .dff modification. Irrelevant but whatever, sweet. :^) Tryr: Never truly understood p2b'ing off light poles but the (reverse?) twist to land looked sweet, as if entirely under control as opposed to just hoping you'd land properly.Clown: Again, simple, but it didn't stand out in a negative way. A solid one.Haywire: Another hill bump realignment. Vastly underrated and makes the stunt seem far more fluent.Nem: Didn't even notice the plane til later. Was just a bump off the curb, yeah? Regardless it's quite a length from what I've experienced; not shabby.Frank: Yet to have success with grinding on anything of that thickness so can't really tell if it's difficult. Average visually, I guess. Esteban: Seemed a bit.. Aimless? Bump itself is indeed in a promising place, but doesn't leave much space to land on anything. Mehmet: Not sure if it's old but certainly a solid land.Zero: Decent amount of air. I remember how shit that flowerbed is to bump off, and seemed like a b2b, which with the smooth screw looked very nice.Fighter: Typical Fighter CSM? <: Indeed basic but I still love anything landing atop that building. Seemed impossible back in the XSA days.Cooper: grinds'a grind. Looked smooth, maybe not the most interesting but again, didn't stand out poorly.Max: A tiny bit aimless? I assume you intended on landing on the longer side of the nets. A bit stuffy of a setup for that short a grind, honestly.Justcaus3: Again, simple smooth grind. Nice conscious twist between.Dev: Another one I've had eyes on for years. It seems like a large gap (as a nobody shitter) but isn't that bad. Regardless it's a decent amount of air and doesn't look out of place.Danger: Assume the goal was to land on the building straight in front of the p2b? A tiny bit eh in general, but I fucking hate setting up side p2bs so I kinda 'tolerate' it.Nem: another mid-air realignment. Lovely.All(beast): Would've been nice to see a tiny bump on the rail, but honestly wouldn't really have led anywhere. Decent enough.Aries: As classic as your name in GTAS. Tricky line-up resulting in a simple bump with some height. Another building I love seeing landed albeit pretty low.Memories: I'm still fucked up regarding RADs, no idea how far 'far' is, but it certainly looked somewhat difficult, even if an old spot. Considering I don't recall you it was pretty decent.
SMF 2.0.19 | SMF © 2021, Simple Machines