[DSS]ozibe - Without Reciprocity

[J.Mario]

replay of the finisher?

[ozibe]

Im wondering, would you doubted if Barney only post this video

Haha great words man, he's such a modder for me and I had my proofs in the past, never used them though cuz people are stupid.

I'm curious about your proofs though, if you still have them PM  Also I can make a clip of the finisher tomorrow, just for funsies. In the mean time enjoy this almost forgotten stunt (3:17):

CT - Symmetry

Send it to me aswell please, I've always hated the hype.

I think that replay could be proof:

https://www.sendspace.com/file/b28y4v

[Blaze]

tfw people upload reps and don't say if it's vc lc or saivc

it's vc btw

[Rainbow]

I think that replay could be proof:
https://www.sendspace.com/file/b28y4v

Why did you waste my time showing me a replay of a guy jetpacking round the VC second island..? And proof for what? Your super short sentences and not explaining anything at all are very confusing.

[Blaze]

He was comparing the height of the VC airport tower/homonuclus ender to some other buildings around VC to prove Barney mods or some shit lol

[ozibe]

If his finisher is possible, these spots should be possible too:

http://postimg.org/image/4vtbtyhfb/

the run up is longer than air port's and that build is lower than finisher


E:


Build is lower about 30ft, because bump is on the bridge and generally lower about 10ft, so spot should be easier to land.

[ShopenZ]

Going to try 

[Rainbow]

Build is lower about 30ft, because bump is on the bridge and generally lower about 10ft, so spot should be easier to land.

That logic is bullshit and you know it. Also here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/sba2k9pthi4kwte/VC_236ft_Barney_finisher.rep?dl=0

Have fun proving I mod for this attempt.

[ozibe]

at first I wrote "It could be proof" after conversation, secound I wrote

If his finisher is possible, these spots should be possible too

I don't think that logic is bullshit. You need about 190ft by p2b with better run up, I saw higher bumps by p2b in LC. Stunt look clean, I will try it later, but still stay weird to get 240ft by this run up

[Gryzlek]

If his finisher is possible, these spots should be possible too:

http://postimg.org/image/4vtbtyhfb/

the run up is longer than air port's and that build is lower than finisher


E:


Build is lower about 30ft, because bump is on the bridge and generally lower about 10ft, so spot should be easier to land.

I'm really curious how you managed to land these stunts being this clueless about the game engine

[Blaze]

If his finisher is possible, these spots should be possible too:

http://postimg.org/image/4vtbtyhfb/

the run up is longer than air port's and that build is lower than finisher


E:


Build is lower about 30ft, because bump is on the bridge and generally lower about 10ft, so spot should be easier to land.

Except one spot is a P2B while going downhill and another is a skimmer bump coming off a ramp. I shouldn't have to say this but different bumps = different heights. It's like saying "oh ____ landed a 200ft natbump to that roof so I should be able to do a 200ft bsm to this roof!" the spot/the stunt itself/the vehicles involved all make a difference.

and I still want an explanation for the name of this video it does not make sense

[ShopenZ]

I failed both spots , tried hard actually and can not reach more than 150-160ft bsm or p2b , but that's me .

[Mati]

! No longer available
! No longer available

Beta, cancelled cus of song

[Billy]

First one looks great.

[ozibe]

I like this type of music, but it fit if you are sitting next to body after murder in forest, smoking, thinking about life and waiting for police , not for stunt movie imo 

E: but I loved it, you showed your high skill of editing