SIGN-UPS: SASL 2013

[JL]

Update:

We're almost up to 48 participants and i'm having trouble to find the right way for the matches to happen.

The original idea was to have 6 people in each 8 groups, but that turned out as ... well, unrealistic, because in that case there would be 288 matches in the group phase alone.

There are two other ways to get over this problem, and i'm posting them here because i kinda want the participants opinion or preferences on that.

1. Option:We instantly start with the K.O. rounds, but there would be 2 rounds of 16-er matches. In that case, 16 people (determined by a randomizer program) would instantly be in the second round and thus would have a slight advantage.

2. OptionEverybody needs to go through some kind of qualifications round and we'll start the K.O.-rounds after that with 32 winners of those qualifications. At this point i have no idea what kind of qualification-task there should be, so gimme' some of your ideas on that if you like this option.


Cheers

[Art Â]

first option maybe? but we could make it like for 16 first signed up instead of randomizing it, imo that should be a gift for being one of first supporters of this league

[JaiK]

Add me. Stunter - JaiK .. Simple 

[iCy]

Add me please as a stunter - iCy

[Ltab-]

Huh I'll join I have arround 50-60 fps in SA but y'know, YOLO.

Stunter - Ltab.

[Determined]

^ 40 is  the perfect amount of fps you can have in SA, it might slightly lower your max speed, but it makes your executions look smooth, stylish & supersexy. I can run at 100+ fps, but mostly I choose to limit it to 40.

[Diaz]

first option maybe? but we could make it like for 16 first signed up instead of randomizing it, imo that should be a gift for being one of first supporters of this league

I can understand this opinion but for me it's seems a bit unfair, I mean I'm really sorry for not checking the forum ALL DAY LONG like a nolifer, no offense. We should find a way to do this. Or what if we wait until 64 participants? I guess it would be fine, I'm just not nearly sure we will reach that number.

[MV]

first option maybe? but we could make it like for 16 first signed up instead of randomizing it, imo that should be a gift for being one of first supporters of this league

I can understand this opinion but for me it's seems a bit unfair, I mean I'm really sorry for not checking the forum ALL DAY LONG like a nolifer, no offense. We should find a way to do this. Or what if we wait until 64 participants? I guess it would be fine, I'm just not nearly sure we will reach that number.

This. It really isn't fair just picking out a number

[JL]

first option maybe? but we could make it like for 16 first signed up instead of randomizing it, imo that should be a gift for being one of first supporters of this league

I can understand this opinion but for me it's seems a bit unfair, I mean I'm really sorry for not checking the forum ALL DAY LONG like a nolifer, no offense. We should find a way to do this. Or what if we wait until 64 participants? I guess it would be fine, I'm just not nearly sure we will reach that number.

This. It really isn't fair just picking out a number

I don't think that would be fair either. Neither with a randomizer in the game.

But 64 propably isn't going to happen. So it would be some sort of qualification round then.

[gesior7]

Sign me up as a backup judge, please. Nickname same as on forums: Gesior7.

[JL]

Sign me up as a backup judge, please. Nickname same as on forums: Gesior7.

I'll gladly do so.
Added everyone else, too!

---
3. Option would be to have 3-way matches in the first round with only one winner.

[Caz]

Can't wait for this... last time I was in stunting league was in 2011 or something similiar to that in Vice City

i prefer the old style but since there's so many participants

[Determined]

Threesomes seem more reasonable than leaving half the participants with thumbs up their asses.

[Art Â]

^that was leaving 32 participants and thats not half of them, thats more

threesomes would make that league too fast IMO

[JL]

Threesomes seem more reasonable than leaving half the participants with thumbs up their asses.

Well, whatever is gonna happen, with 48 stunters were either gonna have threesomes in the first round or a threesome final round. It's a threesome either way.