Author Topic: A small edit test  (Read 1226 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline AristoCracKeD

  • Posts: 193
  • Artists Movies
    • View Profile
A small edit test
« on: May 23, 2012, 08:38:40 PM »
Another editing test
Its a very very quick editing test.

Offline A maid

  • Creator of Worlds
  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 9033
  • Defenestration penetration.
    • View Profile
Re: A small edit test
« Reply #1 on: May 24, 2012, 01:16:29 AM »
It's... okay. I like how you used the flashes but they really need some panning motion. Preferably manually done by pan/crops instead of Newblue's terrible earthquake.
And in the parts without the flashes you're gonna have to work on the calm atmosphere, because just lazily showing a stunt won't do the job for you unless you decide to go 2006 oldschool.

And how you used that terrible cam at the second stunt, don't. I've told people this a lot of times and I probably sound like a 12-year-old crying for candy, but no matter how good your editing is, it will fuck it up completely.

Also, in this case of widescreening, instead of doing it with motion track, use cookie cutter. The image won't be squeezed into the ratio so it'll look much better. With this kind of edit I think that would just look better, however this might just be my taste though.

Good job on everything else, I'm sure you'll improve quickly.

Offline AristoCracKeD

  • Posts: 193
  • Artists Movies
    • View Profile
Re: A small edit test
« Reply #2 on: May 24, 2012, 01:38:12 AM »
thanks for those tips charlie  :hmm:

Offline Tg

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 2047
  • Sup?
    • View Profile
Re: A small edit test
« Reply #3 on: May 24, 2012, 05:23:18 AM »
is it just me or the quality is running low?

edit: lol found out quality is on 240, my bad
« Last Edit: May 27, 2012, 10:27:10 AM by Stunta »

 

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal