Author Topic: Superficial Destroyers - Apotheosis  (Read 11181 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ki4o

  • Posts: 80
    • View Profile
Re: Superficial Destroyers - Apotheosis
« Reply #45 on: March 29, 2012, 12:31:31 PM »
Excellent video.Good stunts best for me were Sharingan,FairFox and Gaz.
Very nice for a first.I'm not a fan of overediting but good job. :)
« Last Edit: March 29, 2012, 12:36:42 PM by ki4o »

Offline FELIX

  • formerly known as Flava and cloudwalker
  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 5131
    • View Profile
    • YouTube
Re: Superficial Destroyers - Apotheosis
« Reply #46 on: March 29, 2012, 04:23:37 PM »
@Izzeee 'landed is landed'?
Strongly depends what kind of stunt imo, if it's a big-air then i'd say yes, but with grinds, combo's etc a good execution is important.

okay, so please imagine following situation:
you've tried a stunt for about 10 hours or even more, just because you want be the one who has landed it at first. finally you've got it but it doesn't look very smooth. what would you do? save it, or not save it? just think about it ;)

I can't recall seeing a new stunt from Nem anyway.


Sexy editing.

Offline FTO

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 3128
  • I've quitted.
    • View Profile
    • FACEBOOK
Re: Superficial Destroyers - Apotheosis
« Reply #47 on: March 29, 2012, 07:25:55 PM »
@Izzeee 'landed is landed'?
Strongly depends what kind of stunt imo, if it's a big-air then i'd say yes, but with grinds, combo's etc a good execution is important.

okay, so please imagine following situation:
you've tried a stunt for about 10 hours or even more, just because you want be the one who has landed it at first. finally you've got it but it doesn't look very smooth. what would you do? save it, or not save it? just think about it ;)

Whether you save it has nothing to do with whether you use it. You have to save it because you must take a look at what you have done. If it's good looking,I will use it but I won't if it's not. I've had a very regretful experience when I released that p2b in an SS crew video in which I landed the palm exactly like Nem did because I didn't have time to try another minute. I will choose to not use it if I have another chance.

Also I don't quite agree with plak because from my point of view,every stunt,no matter huge or technical,HAS to be good-looking. Stunts are something for people to look after all.

Offline PM

  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 3751
    • View Profile
Re: Superficial Destroyers - Apotheosis
« Reply #48 on: March 29, 2012, 10:17:23 PM »

Offline [Bart]

  • Alberto
  • SSU Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1034
    • View Profile
Re: Superficial Destroyers - Apotheosis
« Reply #49 on: March 30, 2012, 04:49:43 AM »
souther and sharingan mod :cheernutz:, maybe exrer 

I like how modders laugh at modders :cheernutz:

Offline Izzeee

  • Posts: 842
    • View Profile
Re: Superficial Destroyers - Apotheosis
« Reply #50 on: March 30, 2012, 05:14:11 AM »
@Izzeee 'landed is landed'?
Strongly depends what kind of stunt imo, if it's a big-air then i'd say yes, but with grinds, combo's etc a good execution is important.

okay, so please imagine following situation:
you've tried a stunt for about 10 hours or even more, just because you want be the one who has landed it at first. finally you've got it but it doesn't look very smooth. what would you do? save it, or not save it? just think about it ;)

I can't recall seeing a new stunt from Nem anyway.


Sexy editing.

his stunt isn't new? o.O
okay, sorry for this mistake but I have a bad memory, so I can't really remember which one is new and which one is old :lol:
but I don't know why the fuck FTO goes so mad just for an old stunt... kinda pointless imo  :ajaja:

Offline FTO

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 3128
  • I've quitted.
    • View Profile
    • FACEBOOK
Re: Superficial Destroyers - Apotheosis
« Reply #51 on: March 30, 2012, 05:22:16 AM »
Nah the palm was new I'm afraid. And I wasn't really mad at the stunt itself. I just couldn't bear a spot being ruined.

Offline OzZarnik

  • Posts: 124
    • View Profile
Re: Superficial Destroyers - Apotheosis
« Reply #52 on: March 30, 2012, 07:06:28 AM »
Who transferred video to this section?
Prove the reason of entering of this video in the section "modded".
In my opinion in this video there is no modded.

Sorry for my bad english ;)

Offline value

  • internationaler player
  • Posts: 595
  • thabang
    • View Profile
    • YOUTUBE
Re: Superficial Destroyers - Apotheosis
« Reply #53 on: March 30, 2012, 07:42:57 AM »
^ +1
if u move it, make a timetable

Offline FELIX

  • formerly known as Flava and cloudwalker
  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 5131
    • View Profile
    • YouTube
Re: Superficial Destroyers - Apotheosis
« Reply #54 on: March 30, 2012, 08:48:48 AM »
Nah the palm was new I'm afraid. And I wasn't really mad at the stunt itself. I just couldn't bear a spot being ruined.
It's old I am 100% sure I have seen it somewhere.

Offline Diaz

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 3314
  • WH
    • View Profile
Re: Superficial Destroyers - Apotheosis
« Reply #55 on: March 30, 2012, 09:50:41 AM »
Nah the palm was new I'm afraid. And I wasn't really mad at the stunt itself. I just couldn't bear a spot being ruined.
It's old I am 100% sure I have seen it somewhere.
You probably saw it as flow's challenge.
And fto's land is much better. But Balsam, why do you show it to everyone here? :(

Offline FTO

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 3128
  • I've quitted.
    • View Profile
    • FACEBOOK
Re: Superficial Destroyers - Apotheosis
« Reply #56 on: March 30, 2012, 10:06:45 AM »
Nah the palm was new I'm afraid. And I wasn't really mad at the stunt itself. I just couldn't bear a spot being ruined.
It's old I am 100% sure I have seen it somewhere.
You probably saw it as flow's challenge.
And fto's land is much better. But Balsam, why do you show it to everyone here? :(

I allowed him to post it here because it had been old anyway.

 

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal