Author Topic: NOT a photographer  (Read 2854 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Genyus

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 6149
    • View Profile
Re: NOT a photographer
« Reply #15 on: February 21, 2012, 07:59:14 AM »
Nice pictures dude, quality stuff for being only 3 days in.

Got this in wallpaper size?  :euro:

Offline Beat

  • d(^---^)b
  • Wasteland Heroes
  • *
  • Posts: 3135
    • View Profile
    • Beat's YouTube page.
Re: NOT a photographer
« Reply #16 on: February 21, 2012, 08:23:55 AM »
Nice pictures dude, quality stuff for being only 3 days in.
http://img18.imageshack.us/img18/29/image1436.png
Got this in wallpaper size?  :euro:

Thanks, and yeah sure thing ;):


I liked the two first ones best though I assume some coloring was done in the post-processing, also nice bokeh on the kit-lens in the last picture.
Not sure if you're using it already but I recommend getting Adobe Lightroom, the beta of v4 is available for free.
Great tool for correcting barrel distortion, chromatic aberration plus post-processing of course, and do not hesitate to post-process.
Most pictures looks decent at best without post-processing or good light conditions.

Thanks for your advice, also come on msn sometime I feel like asking you some n00by questions.

Offline Genyus

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 6149
    • View Profile
Re: NOT a photographer
« Reply #17 on: February 21, 2012, 10:08:57 AM »
Thanks for the wallpaper! :)

Offline XTO --

  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 4334
  • HUEHUEHEU
    • View Profile
Re: NOT a photographer
« Reply #18 on: February 21, 2012, 07:53:31 PM »
Did you really put all that effort to make the first 2 pics :| Would've been easier if you just added the colors yourself, not that this or that would make you any better.

But either way, pictures were nice, specially the 5th. I tried that Adobe program that Daffy mentioned, it seemed really cool, but I didn't really use it since I just got a lame camera and didn't want to spend much time in it.

Good luck

Offline Eddie

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 862
  • Resurrected
    • View Profile
    • I SIR EDWARD!!!
Re: NOT a photographer
« Reply #19 on: February 21, 2012, 08:19:00 PM »
Some really nice pictures there, photography is fun and enjoyable with the outcome, I use the 1100D and it works suprisingly well for the money.

The first 2 pictures do look like they have a bit of colour changes they seem more enhanced then a usual low light picture but im not too sure.

Offline Veno

  • ForbiddenElement.
  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 5326
  • This sentance is a lie.
    • View Profile
    • Venomous`s YouTube Channel
Re: NOT a photographer
« Reply #20 on: February 21, 2012, 10:16:01 PM »
xto, you don't have to own an sick ass camera to make good pics.
f.ex. I made this with random ~100$ digital camera.

and it's a really good shot imo :)
It's harder to capture motion that a still objects.

Offline Cocaine

  • Posts: 1135
  • NL | WL | ASC
    • View Profile
    • YOUTUBE
Re: NOT a photographer
« Reply #21 on: February 22, 2012, 01:56:00 AM »
xto, you don't have to own an sick ass camera to make good pics.
f.ex. I made this with random ~100$ digital camera.

and it's a really good shot imo :)
It's harder to capture motion that a still objects.

sick picture

Offline Beat

  • d(^---^)b
  • Wasteland Heroes
  • *
  • Posts: 3135
    • View Profile
    • Beat's YouTube page.
Re: NOT a photographer
« Reply #22 on: February 22, 2012, 06:55:06 AM »
Did you really put all that effort to make the first 2 pics :| Would've been easier if you just added the colors yourself, not that this or that would make you any better.

I guess you missed the part where the room was pitch black, you'd never get that feel without the slow shutter speed, unless you have proper lighting equipment which I don't have. So yeah to answer your question, with ONLY the camera and the tungsten bulbs in my house this was the only way to get the feel :P

Plus if I really depend on adding everything later then I'm not learning, I'd rather learn to capture better stuff in camera so that they reach a decent level IN camera then start adding stuff later so its EPIC not just good, so I'm learning the camera bit now :P

xto, you don't have to own an sick ass camera to make good pics.
f.ex. I made this with random ~100$ digital camera.

and it's a really good shot imo :)
It's harder to capture motion that a still objects.

Sick picture Veno, but in fact I didn't get the 550D for the photography, I got it for the badass video that is almost film-like, hell with a proper lens it feels like it can battle with a RED camera. So yeah it's definitely great for shooting film.

I'll be starting to make short films soon so, I'll make sure I post that here.
« Last Edit: February 22, 2012, 06:59:22 AM by Beat »

Offline Plani

  • --
  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 4387
  • Since 2008
    • View Profile
Re: NOT a photographer
« Reply #23 on: February 22, 2012, 07:38:25 AM »
Thanks for your advice, also come on msn sometime I feel like asking you some n00by questions.

Haha did the same just a few days before you posted this  :lol: I want to get a camera too and Daffy is helping me  :ajaja:

Anyway , i really enjoyed the pictures dude. You definitely got a good eye for pictures , if you keep practicing you will become a great photographer.
« Last Edit: February 22, 2012, 07:40:39 AM by Plani »

Offline XTO --

  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 4334
  • HUEHUEHEU
    • View Profile
Re: NOT a photographer
« Reply #24 on: February 22, 2012, 05:08:03 PM »
Veno, I've made some quite nice pictures myself, I'll post some later so you guys can see them ^^









I've made these like, 2 years ago, but still, I find them quite nice ^^
« Last Edit: February 22, 2012, 05:28:34 PM by XTO »

Offline __JREN

  • Posts: 2783
  • Beyond Tomorrow
    • View Profile
Re: NOT a photographer
« Reply #25 on: February 23, 2012, 04:45:12 PM »
First thing you did with the 550D? :lol:

 

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal