0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
MW3 looks very like MW2, and MW2 looks fucking amazing, not super realistic or whatever but it looks very nice nonetheless. The only thing that ruined MW2 from being the best cod game was all the stupid stuff that they never fixed. And now MW3 is coming where they have fixed almost everything. I'm not saying it'll be a perfect game, but There is no second chance/last stand. No onemanarmy noobtubing. Explosions are altogether nerfed. If campers annoy you go and play the new gametype Kill Confirmed where you have to go and get the dogtags the person you shoot to confirm the kill. There are new maps, new weapons, new killstreaks and even pointstreaks. Sound thing never bothered me in games. "Oh no they sound the same, this must suck." "Oh hell no god forbid the same animations in a first person shooter." So loads of new stuff in there bro. Also the atmosphere is the same, I love the atmosphere in MW2. Though I should add that I started playing COD when Black Ops was released, so I haven't played MW2 to death. Which would be one of the reasons I'm not tired of that game. But I have played Black ops to death (15th prestige, level 50 :3 ) and I'm not tired of that game. Just some fags that play it. but if I play with a team (some friends or my brother and whatnot, then it's good fun)And another thing about the BF3 engine allowing more features and advanced gameplay. That sounds cool and all, but it feels more like something for the hardcore gamers to enjoy. However it doesn't sound as awesome as "No second Chance" or "No onemanarmy noobtubes" to me. But again that might be because I'm mainly playing cod nowadays. And like I said I am probably going to get BF3, even though I'm not that hyped about it as some people seem to be.
You can't compare these games to each other, you simply can't. Be honest with yourself, if you liked the previous CoDs, don't miss out on this one as it seems to be just the same good old CoD fun, they've hit a formula that works pretty well so why not? and at the same time, if you want to get one of the best action-based shooters from this year, don't miss out on BF3 as it is going to break the limits of everything you've seen before.That said, the only real winner here is the person that gets both and stops comparing them to each other.
They are not comparable because they are totally different and created with the different idea. The only same thing is that they both have the theme of modern day warfare, so the only thing you could compare would be the storylines. People who compare these games to each other are being as dumb as someone comparing an apple to an orange.
topic tl;drhere's the conclusion;CoD = fast paced, full-on action, trickshots, bullshittingBF = the pace of the game depends on what kind of people you're playing with, BF is stragetic, taking your time and overall more seriousness.Just fucking get whichever you're most comfortable playing with, or get both if you're a picky fuck. Don't let anyone talk you out of it cause that's just not right. Like SS said, it's a matter of taste. You're not gonna call someone dumb or whatever because he prefers hamburgers over taco's.
SMF 2.0.19 | SMF © 2021, Simple Machines