White Label [Editing Crew]

[FFUUUrious]

YES, only colours should be a bit better but overall thats awesome 

[NEM]

really nice atmosphere ZeRo !! 

[ZeRo_]

Whoa thanks guys, to be honest I didn't expect this.

[eXe]

Pretty nice vid , but i can't say yes . The edit's simple , you used only 2-3 transitions.. The cc isn't bad , but it should be better. The cam angles were sick . Anyway , nice edit.

This time i'll vote no , sry.





Overedit forever ;3

new overedit =) i edited a challenge.. the edit isn't very good , it has many fails.. but for 10mins i think it's pretty good..

[Phamus]

Pretty nice vid , but i can't say yes . The edit's simple , you used only 2-3 transitions.. The cc isn't bad , but it should be better. The cam angles were sick . Anyway , nice edit.

This time i'll vote no , sry.





Overedit forever ;3

new overedit =) i edited a challenge.. the edit isn't very good , it has many fails.. but for 10mins i think it's pretty good..

I want an Edit Battle With you.

[eXe]

Pretty nice vid , but i can't say yes . The edit's simple , you used only 2-3 transitions.. The cc isn't bad , but it should be better. The cam angles were sick . Anyway , nice edit.

This time i'll vote no , sry.





Overedit forever ;3

new overedit =) i edited a challenge.. the edit isn't very good , it has many fails.. but for 10mins i think it's pretty good..

I want an Edit Battle With you.

why lol?

[Basium_]

Pretty nice vid , but i can't say yes . The edit's simple , you used only 2-3 transitions.. The cc isn't bad , but it should be better. The cam angles were sick . Anyway , nice edit.

This time i'll vote no , sry.

No? 


Well your "overedited" video was totally pointless, effects sucked and even got out from the black borders 
Just...

[Phamus]

why lol?

Okay, I take that as a no 

Nah seriously, if we're both over-editors, then we should like...Clash?

Friendly way, of course.

[eXe]

why lol?

Okay, I take that as a no 

Nah seriously, if we're both over-editors, then we should like...Clash?

Friendly way, of course.

ok mate. just send me a pm with challenge..deadline and stunts.

Pretty nice vid , but i can't say yes . The edit's simple , you used only 2-3 transitions.. The cc isn't bad , but it should be better. The cam angles were sick . Anyway , nice edit.

This time i'll vote no , sry.

No? 

sry mate , but his edit's too simple.. i don't like it very much:( i think he has potential , but isn't enought for WL .




our team's better every day.. i'll vote seriously.. and my vote for ZeRo's no..

[FELIX]

Pretty nice vid , but i can't say yes . The edit's simple , you used only 2-3 transitions.. The cc isn't bad , but it should be better. The cam angles were sick . Anyway , nice edit.

This time i'll vote no , sry.

Now I lost all hope for this forum. What ZeRo showed is way better than everything I've seen from you yet (no offence). Just because you are an overeditor you can't vote no on a good audition because it had only "2-3 transitions" which is 1. not true 2. irrelevant.


 

[eXe]

Pretty nice vid , but i can't say yes . The edit's simple , you used only 2-3 transitions.. The cc isn't bad , but it should be better. The cam angles were sick . Anyway , nice edit.

This time i'll vote no , sry.

Now I lost all hope for this forum. What ZeRo showed is way better than everything I've seen from you yet (no offence). Just because you are an overeditor you can't vote no on a good audition because it had only "2-3 transitions" which is 1. not true 2. irrelevant.


 

i don't vote no because i'm an overeditor.. but idk..i don't like very much his edit.
i am not a VC editor btw..so.. idk very much about that game , about edit on vc =)


anyway , 1 no , 2 yes(or 3..) . So he will accepted

[Basium_]

Pretty nice vid , but i can't say yes . The edit's simple , you used only 2-3 transitions.. The cc isn't bad , but it should be better. The cam angles were sick . Anyway , nice edit.

This time i'll vote no , sry.

Now I lost all hope for this forum. What ZeRo showed is way better than everything I've seen from you yet (no offence). Just because you are an overeditor you can't vote no on a good audition because it had only "2-3 transitions" which is 1. not true 2. irrelevant.


 

True, but with the consideration that he is a WL's member despite his failing on a lot of projects he still got the award to judge, anyways this was a god damn disappointment when a clean and well edited video got a negative award.
By the way Zero, you respected the word "editing" and the related issues but you're still guaranteed to join us, we're waiting for Andy's award and don't lose the prospect.

[iAndy]

@eXe: You have the whole right to say no, but you need to have reasons for it. You had, but like Basium and CW said, you don't really "respect" other styles of editing and that bothers me a bit. I get it that you are a CSS editor but you can't use the same criticism, CS and VC/SA just don't fit.

@Basium: Don't have to wait anymore, I'm here

So, stop it with the weird argues, this is not a place to be mean, you should never be, anywhere. Truth hurts, it's true, but don't make it hurt a lot.

___________________________________________________________________________________________

Now, that you settled it down, I can say something about the last two auditions.

@EvO: You got 3 yes(s) vs. 3 no(s). I say it's a tie, but that thing it's impossible. Sad to say, but I'm more convinced by the against arguments. I'm sorry mate, but this time, You are rejected from White Label.
Try to fix yourself on a specific creation process than to try and variate it. Keep improving but get some real projects and face the real difficulties to learn enough so you could join here.

@ZeRo: Honestly, I'm impressed. It was experimental in many prospects. Every time I was expecting a simple fade in, or a Pan/Crop effect and I got a video-cutting transition and a color sharpen. It had flow, style, that "wow" element that I honestly and obsessively love. The script was a beauty and stood out from all the video. You got my yes good sir, and my respect for your efforts of been different.

[Lolko]

it seems ZeRo's audi is accepted.

[Ltab-]

Ltab is in da house to save dat bitch of ZeRo

Well well well..
Positive things
You've used some pretty nice cam angles tbh, the cc was pretty creative and the editing @ last stunt was really sick man, good job on it! Also nice transitions

Negative things
You've should added more contrast to the cc, looked pretty pallidus. Transitions should be kinda like, more energetic, dunno if you understand me

Overall, was a clean and really decent audi. I'll vooooteeee







































nein
naj jk you got a sure why not from me