Author Topic: [WH]Warfare  (Read 35978 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline FELIX

  • formerly known as Flava and cloudwalker
  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 5131
    • View Profile
    • YouTube
Re: [WH]Warfare
« Reply #195 on: December 28, 2010, 02:48:32 PM »

Offline Determined

  • Pro Coral Collector
  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 5193
  • Pridestalker
    • View Profile
    • Determined's YT Acc
Re: [WH]Warfare
« Reply #196 on: December 28, 2010, 03:48:25 PM »
What is Tangent Universe doing here?  :unsure:

Daffy owned, I'm not really inspired to write a more meaningful post atm  :(

Offline 灰野 敬二

  • 加爾基 精液 栗ノ花
  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 4096
    • View Profile
Re: [WH]Warfare
« Reply #197 on: December 29, 2010, 01:47:08 AM »
Decided to make a review of the stunts.

Stunts:
0:10 - 0:22 (Daffy)      -   Nice idea, flawless execution. I saw it landed by FloW but I don't think he used it anywhere.
0:22 - 0:35 (Taz)        -    Looks great, not very impressive but I liked the speed on the rail considering the angle was so small.
0:35 - 0:43 (KaynT)      -     Nice to see a cabbie stunt that's not bigger than 200ft, impressive landing.
0:44 - 0:56 (Ralleee)    - It was landed before, but modded both times if I rememeber well, cool.
0:56 - 1:04 (Raekwon)    -   Someone should post this as a limbo challenge, it looks fun to try.
1:05 - 1:15 (Rusch69)    -    Good recoil to grind, good idea but doesn't look impressive.
1:15 - 1:23 (Daffy)      -       Look good but boring.
1:24 - 1:38 (burn)       -       I loved the way you reached to the wall, but is simply too hard to love this type of cabbie stunts anymore.
1:38 - 1:49 (Rusch69)    -    The only Quad stunt ever landed in this game I believe is not a piece of shit. Simple badass.
1:50 - 2:05 (Dani0)      -      I edged this without mods one year ago, great job landing it.
2:06 - 2:20 (Ralleee)    -      The idea itself is perfect, the execution could've been just a little better, still very impressive.
2:21 - 2:31 (Daffy)      -       Beautiful.
2:32 - 2:39 (Raekwon)    -   Meh.
2:40 - 2:48 (Daffy)      -      I remember trying that without mods, it was pretty annoying to get a proper bump, doesn't look that good though.
2:48 - 3:04 (Rusch69)    -    Old and not that good tbh.

3:12 - 3:28 (burn)       -    I didn't liked the bonk, directly on top or nothing.
3:30 - 3:40 (Rusch69)    - One of my favorite stunts from the vid, I usually hate your stunting style, I think it's quite boring, but this is something else.
3:41 - 3:49 (Ralleee)    -   Looks alright.
3:50 - 4:00 (burn)       -    Filler.
4:00 - 4:09 (Raekwon)    -  One of the best stunts ever landed in SA, I can't believe you did it first.
4:10 - 4:18 (Stevex)     -    I'm unsure about the legitimacy of this stunt.
4:18 - 4:27 (Daffy)      -    AWESOME grind.
4:28 - 4:36 (Ralleee)    -   Looks big and powerful.
4:37 - 4:48 (Taz)        -    You're the best stunter SA ever had by a mile, but all these recoils to grinds are starting to bore me. However, objectively, the stunt is great, one of the best from the vid.
4:48 - 4:56 (Ralleee)    -    I'm not sure but I think it's old.
4:57 - 5:05 (Daffy)      -    You're one of the few stunters I truly respect along with MMM and Taz, everyone else sucks ass bigtime, no offence.
5:06 - 5:16 (Eddeman)    - You will become a better stunter in SA if you stop listening to Poets of The Fall and other weird bands!
5:17 - 5:26 (Ralleee)    -    Cute double grind you got there.
5:27 - 5:34 (Daksad)     -   I expected a double bump to a random 200ft building from LS but this narrow wallride is nice too lol.
5:35 - 5:48 (Dani0)      -    Again other cabbie stunt I actually liked.
5:49 - 5:57 (Rusch69)    -  Looks beautiful but the stunt itself is so-so.
5:58 - 6:06 (Daffy)      -    Good A to B point stunt, the distance is impressive.
6:07 - 6:14 (burn)       -    Finally a Burn-ish stunt, I miss your old style, and you can't deny you lost it.
6:15 - 6:24 (Rusch69)    - Meh.
6:25 - 6:45 (Odd)        -   I fucking feel sorry for this crew vid, it was probably all clean and enjoyable then THIS! There are not enough facepalms in the world to describe how I feel.

   The only downsides was the editing, which was average as best, it's a shame cause you're a really good VC editor Mythic, most of the cam angles were annoying, CC was a little washed out but good, and finally the soundtrack was terrible. Another downside was Odd's finisher, which is quite laughable, but it's nothing new, we're talking about Odd after all.     
   Everything else was good, overall it's not at the level of Megaton or Onslaught, but it sure is one of the best SA videos of the year.
8.25/10
   
« Last Edit: December 29, 2010, 02:51:42 AM by Baseline »

Offline Stevex

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 2060
  • Emilie Autumn > Lorde
    • View Profile
Re: [WH]Warfare
« Reply #198 on: December 29, 2010, 07:12:03 AM »
4:10 - 4:18 (Stevex)     -    I'm unsure about the legitimacy of this stunt.
Please explain why :)

Offline Odd

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 353
    • View Profile
Re: [WH]Warfare
« Reply #199 on: December 29, 2010, 09:07:00 AM »
Another downside was Odd's finisher, which is quite laughable, but it's nothing new, we're talking about Odd after all.     


Really sad you think something like that of me  :(

Offline VaNilla

  • next week m9
  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 3809
    • View Profile
    • YouTube
Re: [WH]Warfare
« Reply #200 on: December 29, 2010, 10:00:09 AM »
Why not just upload your replay and solve all explanation Odd? I'm pretty that if I used freeplay on your stunt, and set a freecam by the boats that are in the water, they'd be floating up as you did that stunt.

Offline Odd

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 353
    • View Profile
Re: [WH]Warfare
« Reply #201 on: December 29, 2010, 12:09:37 PM »
I'm with my girlfriend, i'll send it when i'm back to home, sunday  :ajaja:

Offline Mythic

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 3695
  • WH Member
    • View Profile
Re: [WH]Warfare
« Reply #202 on: December 29, 2010, 12:54:02 PM »
I could upload it now if you want to. :)

Offline VaNilla

  • next week m9
  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 3809
    • View Profile
    • YouTube
Re: [WH]Warfare
« Reply #203 on: December 29, 2010, 02:08:13 PM »
Do it, that and Danio's double bump :P

Offline Mythic

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 3695
  • WH Member
    • View Profile
Re: [WH]Warfare
« Reply #204 on: December 29, 2010, 03:23:39 PM »
You're going to have to ask Dani0 for that, I don't share the replays unless given permission.

Here's Odd's one since he couldn't upload right now: http://yjgqga.alterupload.com/Odd's finisher.rar

Offline VaNilla

  • next week m9
  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 3809
    • View Profile
    • YouTube
Re: [WH]Warfare
« Reply #205 on: December 29, 2010, 03:32:09 PM »
And that replay proves it, do a freecam on the boats each time he bumps, they raise up slightly from their original level ;). Not even a debate now, it's a fact.

Offline FELIX

  • formerly known as Flava and cloudwalker
  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 5131
    • View Profile
    • YouTube
Re: [WH]Warfare
« Reply #206 on: December 29, 2010, 04:08:03 PM »
making a clip for all the lazy guys. not saying odd mods tho.

there:
Odd
« Last Edit: December 29, 2010, 04:46:08 PM by cloudwalker »

Offline VaNilla

  • next week m9
  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 3809
    • View Profile
    • YouTube
Re: [WH]Warfare
« Reply #207 on: December 29, 2010, 04:17:08 PM »
Also just to clarify, I don't think he used gravity alone.

Offline Ralleee

  • The Ralmeister
  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 5403
    • View Profile
Re: [WH]Warfare
« Reply #208 on: December 29, 2010, 04:55:17 PM »
Eh, what the hell does that video prove? The boat is fucking bouncing because it was spawned in the water.

Offline KillaMarci

  • <3
  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 8700
  • Don't you remember the monsters?
    • View Profile
Re: [WH]Warfare
« Reply #209 on: December 29, 2010, 04:58:49 PM »
haha yea...that seriously doesn't prove a thing :s

 

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal