0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Sweet on July 29, 2010, 08:33:01 PMQuote from: Mythic on July 29, 2010, 03:50:00 PMQuote from: Ruchy on July 29, 2010, 02:57:29 PMYou should have organized this with double elimination, at least stunters would have a 2nd chance if they lost the first match. nope, trust me, double elimination just creates a big headache if you get a bunch of no shows, which undoubtedly will happen.What if some admin made statement that guy who no-shows gets week ban or something
Quote from: Mythic on July 29, 2010, 03:50:00 PMQuote from: Ruchy on July 29, 2010, 02:57:29 PMYou should have organized this with double elimination, at least stunters would have a 2nd chance if they lost the first match. nope, trust me, double elimination just creates a big headache if you get a bunch of no shows, which undoubtedly will happen.
Quote from: Ruchy on July 29, 2010, 02:57:29 PMYou should have organized this with double elimination, at least stunters would have a 2nd chance if they lost the first match.
You should have organized this with double elimination, at least stunters would have a 2nd chance if they lost the first match.
so this will be KO - system ?when i lose one match im out ?
I liked the system that Brulla and Kingjad made, cause everyone got atleast 5 tries or something like that. Though I'm cool with this setup as well, but I think it would be better with loser rounds. Cause if people get challenges they fucking suck at, that's just boring. But hey, whatever floats the organizers boats
Hey Simon, a challenge should be challenging, don't you think?
Quote from: Simon on July 30, 2010, 08:29:29 AMI liked the system that Brulla and Kingjad made, cause everyone got atleast 5 tries or something like that. Though I'm cool with this setup as well, but I think it would be better with loser rounds. Cause if people get challenges they fucking suck at, that's just boring. But hey, whatever floats the organizers boats if you're a good stunter then you should be good at everything
Quote from: Streem on July 30, 2010, 01:14:09 AMQuote from: Sweet on July 29, 2010, 08:33:01 PMQuote from: Mythic on July 29, 2010, 03:50:00 PMQuote from: Ruchy on July 29, 2010, 02:57:29 PMYou should have organized this with double elimination, at least stunters would have a 2nd chance if they lost the first match. nope, trust me, double elimination just creates a big headache if you get a bunch of no shows, which undoubtedly will happen.What if some admin made statement that guy who no-shows gets week ban or somethingand then we'd have alot of suspended people; Trust me, not worth the trouble.
Quote from: Sweet on July 30, 2010, 03:48:34 AMQuote from: Streem on July 30, 2010, 01:14:09 AMQuote from: Sweet on July 29, 2010, 08:33:01 PMQuote from: Mythic on July 29, 2010, 03:50:00 PMQuote from: Ruchy on July 29, 2010, 02:57:29 PMYou should have organized this with double elimination, at least stunters would have a 2nd chance if they lost the first match. nope, trust me, double elimination just creates a big headache if you get a bunch of no shows, which undoubtedly will happen.What if some admin made statement that guy who no-shows gets week ban or somethingand then we'd have alot of suspended people; Trust me, not worth the trouble.I can completely agree that it will create more noshows, but there will be no shows anyways like in all leagues, plus double elimination would create more interesting matches. I'm also suggesting that, cuz I feel like facing a hard first match
SMF 2.0.19 | SMF © 2021, Simple Machines