0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I just wonder.. so limbo you did yesterday wasn't 60 but 110 fps?
It doesn't suck, at least because of that. Everyone can have FPS their PC allows to have, if someone is bitching about it they're probably just jealous because their PC's suck.
An interesting remark I just tought of: During the history of Vice City stunting, some people used FL-off and got heights over everyone else. Then, it started being tought of as ALMOST modding. Now, history repeats itself, only this time something different must have happened, since FL-off ISN'T considered anything NEAR the VC fl-off. Makes you think, doesn't it?
Quote from: OstitsAn interesting remark I just tought of: During the history of Vice City stunting, some people used FL-off and got heights over everyone else. Then, it started being tought of as ALMOST modding. Now, history repeats itself, only this time something different must have happened, since FL-off ISN'T considered anything NEAR the VC fl-off. Makes you think, doesn't it? SA's replays doesn't look as floaty and airy as VC's with FL-off, near any stunt landed in VC without Framelimiter looks modded.
Quote from: MythicQuote from: OstitsAn interesting remark I just tought of: During the history of Vice City stunting, some people used FL-off and got heights over everyone else. Then, it started being tought of as ALMOST modding. Now, history repeats itself, only this time something different must have happened, since FL-off ISN'T considered anything NEAR the VC fl-off. Makes you think, doesn't it? SA's replays doesn't look as floaty and airy as VC's with FL-off, near any stunt landed in VC without Framelimiter looks modded.Yes, I guess that explains it. Because in SA it doesn't look modded, whereas in VC it does, that's why SA FL-off is roaming. Still, the effects are pretty much the same. Do we agree?
SMF 2.0.19 | SMF © 2021, Simple Machines