0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I think this is impossible. Because you cannot jump toward to the top of the crane if you bump on the fence. Height and distance is enough, but the angle is not.
I already switched to fl on. Soon everyone will follow me. Seriously you can land big shit in SA fl on it's just way harder. Having tried fl on for a while i'm getting used to fl on pretty well now and i did try DC's famous sf bridge stunt and i nearly landed the ship a couple of times. I got the distance, didn't get the angle. i believe crossing the bridge to other side is possible fl on.
Nobody cares but explo already crossed the bridge to the other side fl on.
I already switched to fl on. Soon everyone will follow me.
Quote from: RochePeachI already switched to fl on. Soon everyone will follow me. I agree with what Roche said I've done a few fl on stunts and its pretty harder than fl off..But in the end I think the way you stunt has alot to do with your computer...Better computer better fps better stunts..
Quote from: RalleeeThen, you suck. I'm tired of all the fps bullshit on here, "you really need 300+ fps to do that stunt", that shit. I've been close to the lower part myself, and I don't have more than 40 fps or somethingI'm afraid it does make a big difference. For the time where I was stunting with 50 FPS, my best record height for 3 YEARS, was 190ft. Then recently I used a program that cuts out all draw distance, lowers graphics to 1.6 levels etc, getting 110fps in the airport. That day I broke my own record with 203ft, then 206ft, then 223ft. If that isn't proof I don't know what is.
Then, you suck. I'm tired of all the fps bullshit on here, "you really need 300+ fps to do that stunt", that shit. I've been close to the lower part myself, and I don't have more than 40 fps or something
SMF 2.0.19 | SMF © 2021, Simple Machines