Author Topic: New members taken in  (Read 13256 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline ofthemountain

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 1149
    • View Profile
New members taken in
« Reply #45 on: May 23, 2008, 01:17:03 AM »
I'm all for this crew continuing and I think you have loads of potential. However I think it's unfair on crews like CT who have wanted a section for ages and have worked hard to build a crew from nothing for a group of people who have so far acheived much less (not saying you're bad or not going to acheive as much, I'm sure you will) to walk in and immediately have their own section before they have even spoken to eachother.

I really wish you guys the best of luck but as this is a totally different crew, as in a completely new set of members I think you guys should have to work to get your own section like every other crew instead of having one without having done anything.

Offline Balance

  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 2580
  • Boys Don't Cry
    • View Profile
    • SoundCloud
New members taken in
« Reply #46 on: May 23, 2008, 01:24:03 AM »
congratz
« Last Edit: May 23, 2008, 01:24:14 AM by Balance »

Offline Vicarious

  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 1130
  • Brilson
    • View Profile
New members taken in
« Reply #47 on: May 23, 2008, 01:24:55 AM »
Quote from: ofthemountain
I think you guys should have to work to get your own section like every other crew instead of having one without having done anything.

Im agree 100% with this.

Looking at the lineup now it is pretty much made up of "new school" stunters who havnt done much at all to help USS.

Offline FIGHTER

  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 11259
    • View Profile
New members taken in
« Reply #48 on: May 23, 2008, 01:29:01 AM »
Quote from: Vicarious
Quote from: ofthemountain
I think you guys should have to work to get your own section like every other crew instead of having one without having done anything.

Im agree 100% with this.

Looking at the lineup now it is pretty much made up of "new school" stunters who havnt done much at all to help USS.
dude wtf Im now for 1 day in USS, so how teh fuck can i help USS in 1 day   btw im here longer than u....
wtf do u mean with new school stunters? I mean a p2b and grinds are new school????
« Last Edit: May 23, 2008, 01:32:28 AM by FIGHTER »

Offline Vicarious

  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 1130
  • Brilson
    • View Profile
New members taken in
« Reply #49 on: May 23, 2008, 01:32:40 AM »
Quote from: FIGHTER
dude wtf Im now for 1 day in USS, so how teh fuck can i help USS in 1 day   btw im here longer than u....

Thats my point, most of the members are like you and joined not so long ago, and now the crew is nearly full of them. So like OTM was saying, instead of a crew like CT who has alot of members who have been trying hard for a long time to get their own section, USS is quickly filling up with new members who easily get access to their own section.

Edit: I dont even know if im in USS because Macsta wanted to discuss me with other crew members

And maybe New School was the wrong term to use, what i meant was the lineup consisted of relatively new stunters.
« Last Edit: May 23, 2008, 01:34:30 AM by Vicarious »

Offline Emperatris

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 1862
  • EmpyLicious | Ms. Elle
    • View Profile
New members taken in
« Reply #50 on: May 23, 2008, 01:32:58 AM »
But Xtramus is still in the crew (I wish ).

Offline FIGHTER

  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 11259
    • View Profile
New members taken in
« Reply #51 on: May 23, 2008, 01:34:12 AM »
whats the point to make an extra section for CT I dont understand that for a long time now....

« Last Edit: May 23, 2008, 01:38:30 AM by FIGHTER »

Offline Flat Face

  • With power comes lulz
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 9243
    • View Profile
New members taken in
« Reply #52 on: May 23, 2008, 01:50:09 AM »
Quote from: Brulla
Quote from: Rod
Quote from: Brulla
Ehm....Xtramus where are ya?!
Why don't you actualy support the new guys and wish good luck to USS instead of cry for Xtramus with this "this is not USS anymore you are ruinning it" shit?

I do support the new guys, I just don't like that they are taking advantage of USS's reputation and the crew section.

Take a look at Mythic here for example, seems like he's picking several new members in the crew before even consulting with the other members (maca). And who invited Mythic to the USS? He was invited by the other new guys. After a while, USS will be rendered to something completely new and different (well, it has pretty much happened already).

I hate to be the one repeating this over and over again, but seems like a lot of people are thinking it but not saying a word. You can dislike me for doing this, I can live with that. I just care too much of the old crews like USS to let them be hijacked.

i r agree

Offline FIGHTER

  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 11259
    • View Profile
New members taken in
« Reply #53 on: May 23, 2008, 02:12:23 AM »
Quote from: Enough
Good job ! dude Fighter  
hehe thanks man

Offline Daffy

  • V.I.P. Member
  • Posts: 13506
  • WH & NU Founder
    • View Profile
New members taken in
« Reply #54 on: May 23, 2008, 02:27:39 AM »
Looks like some of you are expecting a revolution from day 1, give them a chance and then judge them by how they used that chance they were given instead of de-motivating them.

Offline ofthemountain

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 1149
    • View Profile
New members taken in
« Reply #55 on: May 23, 2008, 02:46:30 AM »
All I'm saying is that they should have to proove themselves like any other crew with a couple of videos before they get their own section. I don't think that's demotivating them, if anything I think that's more motivation. I really think this crew has potential but it should have to show it first before it gets a section.

Offline Daffy

  • V.I.P. Member
  • Posts: 13506
  • WH & NU Founder
    • View Profile
New members taken in
« Reply #56 on: May 23, 2008, 03:02:15 AM »
You're just jealous

Naah, i get your point but what do you suggest... that the USS section is removed in favor of another crew so they have to fight to get a new one?
Come on, it's been walking on its stumps for quite a while now... give them a break while they're rebuilding

Offline FIGHTER

  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 11259
    • View Profile
New members taken in
« Reply #57 on: May 23, 2008, 03:45:26 AM »
yes and whats the problem? why cant we make an extra section for CT?

Offline ofthemountain

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 1149
    • View Profile
New members taken in
« Reply #58 on: May 23, 2008, 03:50:48 AM »
Quote from: Daffy
You're just jealous

Naah, i get your point but what do you suggest... that the USS section is removed in favor of another crew so they have to fight to get a new one?
Come on, it's been walking on its stumps for quite a while now... give them a break while they're rebuilding

 Honestly though we don't need a section, I was more thinking about CT who have been asking about one for ages.

Well I think it would be some kind of test at least, I would like to think they would come through it well otherwise it would be like they joined for a name. I guess we'll just have to see what happens from here.

Offline Flat Face

  • With power comes lulz
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 9243
    • View Profile
New members taken in
« Reply #59 on: May 23, 2008, 04:01:40 AM »
yeah.. tbh i reckon ampt n gvt should be removed, n have a test for crews that have been around to get a section, like what ^^ was talking about..or like what was mentioned a long time ago about the .. current crews and the memorial thing or something for the old inactive ones.

 

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal