Author Topic: The Frame Limiter Injustice (Read 11819 times)

Brainkiller · « **Reply #15 on:** February 15, 2008, 09:58:50 AM »

Quote from: KillaMarci

Quote from: Tackleberry
Quote from: JL
But seriously, what makes it bad to stunt FL off? I don't see the reason.
Cause it make the replays look like crap?

Yea that's IMO the only downside of it. Maybe someone can make a fix for it?

That's impossible you screwdriver.

The replay would still look like crap because the crap looking is caused by the variation of fps.

JL · « **Reply #16 on:** February 15, 2008, 09:59:03 AM »

Quote from: Brainkiller

Quote from: Tackleberry
Quote from: JL
But seriously, what makes it bad to stunt FL off? I don't see the reason.
Cause it make the replays look like crap?
You only land higher stunts because your pc is better?

--

btw. Your calculations about height aren't correct, plus less gravity because of fl off = even higher than your calcs.

That's an option which is avaivable for everyone.

Ghost · « **Reply #17 on:** February 15, 2008, 09:59:49 AM »

Maybe instead of trying to limit our possibilities (FL on) we should try to push boundries and the limits of stunting? I'm not at all supporting either side of the argument, I stunt FL on or off, depends what I feel like.
Just another idea thrown into the mix, watching.

FoX`MaSteR · « **Reply #18 on:** February 15, 2008, 10:00:58 AM »

Quote from: KaynT

Quote from: FoX`MaSteR
I dont tell about better or worst, it's just sad for the lagy players who must use fl-on, do you understand?
Who said that they MUST use fl on?

if you lag you cant play fl-off

Fl-on stunters cant reach some building

Brainkiller · « **Reply #19 on:** February 15, 2008, 10:01:11 AM »

Quote from: JL

Quote from: Brainkiller
Quote from: Tackleberry
Quote from: JL
But seriously, what makes it bad to stunt FL off? I don't see the reason.
Cause it make the replays look like crap?
You only land higher stunts because your pc is better?

--

btw. Your calculations about height aren't correct, plus less gravity because of fl off = even higher than your calcs.
That's an option which is avaivable for everyone.

Are you dumb?

Put it this way:

Guy 1: 25fps 100ft bump.

Guy 2: (average guy with fl off) 40-60fps 130ft

Guy 3: (guy with amazing pc) 150-200fps 200ft

Now imagine you are guy 2 and you spend 5 hours trying a bump and guy 3 comes along and lands it in 5 minutes time because he has a better pc.

THEREFORE FL off is not EVEN or FAIR.

But it will be continued to be used and continue to be accepted so there's no point in even arguing about it.

Stunt however you like aslong as you have fun, but don't spew bullshit like "fl off is even and it's fair because everyone has the option"

CRYOSPHERE · « **Reply #20 on:** February 15, 2008, 10:01:16 AM »

You can't really create a good stable fps amount because it depends on the texture and the models around you.
I still don't care. I will stunt FL: Off. If you're just jealous because you got a crappy PC, then buy a better one...

Mewka · « **Reply #21 on:** February 15, 2008, 10:02:01 AM »

I play Fl OFF and have 40-60 frames in second. It's a lot of frames? NO... soiemtimes I have 30-40 so it's not too many.

FoX`MaSteR · « **Reply #22 on:** February 15, 2008, 10:02:26 AM »

Quote from: JL

Quote from: Brainkiller
Quote from: Tackleberry
Quote from: JL
But seriously, what makes it bad to stunt FL off? I don't see the reason.
Cause it make the replays look like crap?
You only land higher stunts because your pc is better?

--

btw. Your calculations about height aren't correct, plus less gravity because of fl off = even higher than your calcs.
That's an option which is avaivable for everyone.

more speed = more fts height with the same skill

JL · « **Reply #23 on:** February 15, 2008, 10:02:32 AM »

Quote from: CRYOSPHERE

You can't really create a good stable fps amount because it depends on the texture and the models around you.
I still don't care. I will stunt FL: Off. If you're just jealous because you got a crappy PC, then buy a better one...

Word.

FoX`MaSteR · « **Reply #24 on:** February 15, 2008, 10:05:04 AM »

--

btw. Your calculations about height aren't correct, plus less gravity because of fl off = even higher than your calcs.
[/quote]
That's an option which is avaivable for everyone.
[/quote]

calculations are corrects, dont try to confuse me, you can calculate yourself!

=> i can play 60fps but i think it's more fairplay to stunt fl-on

Brainkiller · « **Reply #25 on:** February 15, 2008, 10:05:09 AM »

idiot face i was saying you under calculated.

You didn't take into affect the effect that fps has on tick rate/gravity.

FoX`MaSteR · « **Reply #26 on:** February 15, 2008, 10:06:15 AM »

Fl-off is less fairplay than fl-on

morbidxxx · « **Reply #27 on:** February 15, 2008, 10:06:59 AM »

Quote from: CRYOSPHERE

You can't really create a good stable fps amount because it depends on the texture and the models around you.
I still don't care. I will stunt FL: Off. If you're just jealous because you got a crappy PC, then buy a better one...

FoX`MaSteR · « **Reply #28 on:** February 15, 2008, 10:10:48 AM »

with 289km/h you could reach with a vertical perfect bump without air-effect more than 200fts but the gravity change if you do a krail or cork! and the Fl-off's krail are faster, so you bump more with more speed and you have more time to put your bike to the good position, the gravity of fl-off is the same, it's just looking diferent!

dont stop on the gravity, i call about fairplay

Ghost · « **Reply #29 on:** February 15, 2008, 10:13:54 AM »

What do you mean fair play? This isn't the olympics!
People should be able to stunt however they want, the only problem I see about FL off from your videos is the one's who call FL on users noobs.
Just because some people use FL on doesnt make them a bad stunter, look at explosion or nucleardeath, they use FL on and are awesome stunters.