Author Topic: GTASL3 Grand Championship: Daffy vs. Cdarmy (Read 44386 times)

Barney · « **Reply #135 on:** June 06, 2007, 03:54:43 PM »

that taxi stunt looked weird as hell

nice air to bump

Rod · « **Reply #136 on:** June 06, 2007, 03:56:39 PM »

Quote from: Barney

that taxi stunt looked weird as hell

x2

but i didnt understand how the last stunt was a 3part combo...

Bliss · « **Reply #137 on:** June 06, 2007, 03:59:17 PM »

a bonk 2 roof. Can't see a 3 part combo in it.
good stunts btw

GiftedMisfit · « **Reply #138 on:** June 06, 2007, 03:59:56 PM »

that first stunt was awesome(all 3 were, 1st especially), can't wait to see if cdarmy has anything to submit

morbidxxx · « **Reply #139 on:** June 06, 2007, 04:01:04 PM »

air2bonk2roof Nice stunts Daffy The taxi stunt was little bit weird

Daffy · « **Reply #140 on:** June 06, 2007, 04:02:41 PM »

Quote from: Omni

and how the last stunt was a 3-part combo

Ramp2Bonk2Roof

Quote from: Barney

that taxi stunt looked weird as hell
nice air to bump

At first i was trying to land on the building to the right of the tanks, then i landed up-side down on the roof i landed on later and found out i could do a multi boost of the tanks and get lots of air off the tanks.

Omni · « **Reply #141 on:** June 06, 2007, 04:02:43 PM »

Landing on a roof counts as part of a combo? Since when?

Noapologies in the first post said this:

Quote

There must be 3 parts to the combo, choose from the following stunts: BSM/ISM/PSM, p2b, bump (bonk), grind, stoppie, wheelie, wallride, wallclimb, air/ground grabs

I don't see roof coming in as part of the stunts you could choose from. Don't get me wrong that last stunt was sick but IMO and from what I can see from the rules, that last stunt was not a valid 3-part combo.

Daffy · « **Reply #142 on:** June 06, 2007, 04:05:34 PM »

If i hadn't landed on a roof it wouldn't had been a stunt would it?
Duh.

Rod · « **Reply #143 on:** June 06, 2007, 04:21:08 PM »

Quote from: Daffy

Quote from: Omni
and how the last stunt was a 3-part combo
Ramp2Bonk2Roof

humm, i dont think that counts as a 3 part combo...if landing on a building could be considered as a part of the combo, every p2roof, bsm2roof would be a combo too.

i mean, it was an amazing stunt, but you could have landed something with 3 parts...

Barney · « **Reply #144 on:** June 06, 2007, 04:23:25 PM »

it was a ramp2AIR2bonk2roof

air, bonk, roof

Omni · « **Reply #145 on:** June 06, 2007, 04:27:54 PM »

Air is not part of a combo. Neither is roof. Read the rules that Noapologies states clearly in his 1st post.

Barney · « **Reply #146 on:** June 06, 2007, 04:30:26 PM »

bad luck daf lol

Daffy · « **Reply #147 on:** June 06, 2007, 04:30:27 PM »

Motherfuckers of course it is, if i would had landed on plain ground it wouldn't had been a stunt.
If you do a bump and land on the ground it was just a bump but if you bumped to a roof it's a bump2roof, why don't we just go around doing high bumps to nothing and call it stunts then?

It's thankfully not up to you pricks to decide.
If NoA chooses to draw the amazing conclusion that it did not have 3 elements which would cause landslides and riots and force me to murder him during the next spring break, here's an alternative for you fucks as i was first trying to redo kaneda's bailed grind from Interlocked.
http://download.yousendit.com/7AFB6AC479698E25

Kingjad · « **Reply #148 on:** June 06, 2007, 04:39:49 PM »

All nice stunts (second looked weird as hell hehe.)

My opinion...the rules are clearly stated in the opening post by NoAp. But since there's a bit of confusion here, let NoAp try and clarify when he gets to see this. I personally think Daffy didn't do a 3-part combo...but it was still a gorgeous stunt.

EDIT: I see Daffy's getting a bit grumpy above me. Cut that shit out Daffy, or else I'll just poke the bear with the stick.

Caio · « **Reply #149 on:** June 06, 2007, 04:42:10 PM »

That's strange, but it's a three way, a roof is a part of the stunt IMO...

The taxi stunt was.... AWeSOME