Author Topic: Ask TMS (Read 529529 times)

Turtle Dick · « **Reply #3225 on:** July 20, 2008, 02:26:01 AM »

Children of Bodom has alot of great songs but She Is Beautiful isn't one of them. Andrew WK's version is alot better.

Lanza · « **Reply #3226 on:** July 20, 2008, 06:54:30 AM »

DC or Kingjad or kr3m or TD or tackl: did you guys do anything about infinity? havent seen him ina a while

BoBsaget · « **Reply #3227 on:** July 20, 2008, 07:15:17 AM »

Okay, from now on, no more admin questions. Those kind of questions aren't supposed to be asked here, cause it doesn't concern TMS in particulair. So don't ask mod questions here, the post will be deleted.

Dannye · « **Reply #3228 on:** July 20, 2008, 07:59:18 AM »

To any/all of you, what movies would you describe as being "must see", and why?

KillaMarci · « **Reply #3229 on:** July 20, 2008, 08:10:52 AM »

Lagoon: Cause it's just ownage because it's........ "different"
Doperide III : Just one of the most ownage videos ever made especially because of the song
Echo: Lot's of oldschool stunters like Tackleberry , and It's great to see them in SA

NuclearDeath · « **Reply #3230 on:** July 20, 2008, 08:12:44 AM »

I think he speaks about movie, not stunt videos

So one of my favorite movies is For a few dollars more. There isn't a lot of talk in this movie, all is in the eyes and also in the behaviour of the actors. That pushes my admiration.

And another one I would describe as being "must see" is American Gangster with Denzel Washington, it has more or less the same characteristics as For a few dollars more, people don't talk a lot and the actors are gentlemen (the main one anyway) and how he pwn all his enemies in a few months with an original idea pushed my admiration as well.

There are a lot of more movies that I enjoy a lot as well .

EDIT : I loved "No country of old men" too. I'm really sensible about the behaviours of actors and in this film as well, actors have got an original one and the history is kinda exciting.

KillaMarci · « **Reply #3231 on:** July 20, 2008, 08:17:47 AM »

Oh I don't watch any movies because they're not "real". Know what I mean?

Kert · « **Reply #3232 on:** July 20, 2008, 08:51:56 AM »

"No Country for Old Men" and "Pulp Fiction"

They managed to keep me on the edge of my seat for the whole movie. Really good actors showing what they do best.

вαℓυ · « **Reply #3233 on:** July 20, 2008, 09:02:08 AM »

Kert, what is your opinion about TD's new signature?
I'm just asking this because the one I made is kinda similar to the one you made, that didn't make sense at all did it.

BoBsaget · « **Reply #3234 on:** July 20, 2008, 11:33:14 AM »

Quote from: Dannye

To any/all of you, what movies would you describe as being "must see", and why?

I've been watching some nice movies lately, but here are some I would recommend (Not really indept why's though, but I wouldn't put them in this list if I didn't like them):

Shooter; Action shooter, nice story line, cool movie!

28 Days later; Virus takes over England, shit goes mad! Awesome shots from an abondoned Lodon which is just awesome to see.

28 Weeks Later; sequel to 28 Days Later, nice too watch, like 28 Days better though.

Dawn of the Dead; Yay more Zombies, watched it today and in my memory it was better, but enjoyable non the less.

Sin City; Awesomely weird flick, but a really cool style.

From Dusk Till Dawn; Goes into zombie slasher out of nowhere!

Boondock Saints; Awesome.

Snatch; Awesome.

Forgetting Sarah Marshall; Funny stuff.

Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels; Awesome story line.

And like Kert said Pulp Fiction, I hated No Country for Old Men though, just too weird.

Kert · « **Reply #3235 on:** July 20, 2008, 11:41:49 AM »

Quote from: Killerstunter

Kert, what is your opinion about TD's new signature?
I'm just asking this because the one I made is kinda similar to the one you made, that didn't make sense at all did it.

I don't like it for the exact same reason you just said.

вαℓυ · « **Reply #3236 on:** July 20, 2008, 11:54:47 AM »

Quote from: Kert

I don't like it for the exact same reason you just said.

Hey, sorry dude. I really didn't mean to copy/steal your idea. It's just kinda hard to come up with something except a turtle inside TD's infernus[and a bike] and obviously I am not that creative to come up with something genius. Again sorry.
You know I can remove it if you want[with permission from TD].
Edit: Sorry for off-topic TMS.

Kert · « **Reply #3237 on:** July 20, 2008, 01:33:30 PM »

If it was hard then why do it? If you knew it was like copying

doesn't matter to me to be honest, what signature TD wants to use.

Tackleberry · « **Reply #3238 on:** July 20, 2008, 01:53:39 PM »

Quote from: Dannye

To any/all of you, what movies would you describe as being "must see", and why?

I can't really think of any specific ones I would call a "must see" right now, sorry. However, among the latest movies I've watched I liked "In Bruges" the most.

I have to disagree with Kert and Nuc though, everyone shouldn't watch "No Country for Old Men". I didn't enjoy it and personally I don't think so many people would say they love it if it wasn't because of the high ratings it got. It's artistic, got great acting and all that, but to me it wasn't something I enjoyed watching. I think many people wouldn't enjoy it, so therefore I wouldn't call it a "must see".

Notice that I don't criticize that you like the vid, Kert and Nuc.

NuclearDeath · « **Reply #3239 on:** July 20, 2008, 02:44:27 PM »

I think we can call a movie "must see" from a personal point of view tack, we call it like that more to say "I enjoyed it" than to say "everybody will enjoy" because all taste are different

Anyway, I understand what you wanna say, "No country for old men" is quite, particular.