Author Topic: Official GTASL2 Bracket (Read 17570 times)

Falcon · « **Reply #60 on:** August 19, 2006, 12:39:01 AM »

is this shit restarting now?

Omni · « **Reply #61 on:** August 19, 2006, 03:31:07 AM »

If someone does it next time they really need a better bracket. That ones FUCKED up. Why should some people have less matches or go through the first round without a match? Every time I look at this section of the forums it seems to be getting worse. We need good organisation for something like this.

_Hiei_ · « **Reply #62 on:** August 19, 2006, 04:16:19 AM »

so where should I be?

deviate · « **Reply #63 on:** August 19, 2006, 10:53:03 AM »

Yummy, looks like I got Hunt.

Psycho · « **Reply #64 on:** August 19, 2006, 12:19:09 PM »

omni, thats how uneven tournaments work... if you want a perfect bracket you have to have 16 or 32 people. Otherwise... its just the luck of the draw, i put them in alphabetical order, on the numbered spaces, its like 15642783 etc... so the numbers arent "random" but when you mix two orders together it certainly is... If AEnima's name was Enigma or Shogun or Raxar at the start of this, it would have been different, and he wouldn't have gotten a bye... and the order will be randomized differently next time, i will actually put names into a hat and draw them out one by one.

and hiei, i just updated it, youll go against the winner between stuntman and GTAgamer

_Hiei_ · « **Reply #65 on:** August 19, 2006, 02:34:18 PM »

cool, now the winners bracket is going on, shouldn't we start the losers matches?

or will they start when the winners' are over?

NoAPOlogies · « **Reply #66 on:** August 19, 2006, 02:54:30 PM »

Quote from: Omni

If someone does it next time they really need a better bracket. That ones FUCKED up. Why should some people have less matches or go through the first round without a match? Every time I look at this section of the forums it seems to be getting worse. We need good organisation for something like this.

I had always though we should've closed this at 24 people, that way the brackets will remain even up until the finals (where there would be three competetors). In the losers' bracket we could do a 3-way-final and in the winner's bracket, the three finalist would be joined by the losers' bracket winner. That would/will be my idea.

deviate · « **Reply #67 on:** August 19, 2006, 09:22:40 PM »

Wait so when am I getting my match?

Psycho · « **Reply #68 on:** August 19, 2006, 11:05:04 PM »

@NoAP but if you happen to get enough for 32, then you can have the top two winners vs the top loser, if u still want 3

@AEniShoRaxanimagunigmar....... i have no idea, Torque seems to be going in his own order or something...

deviate · « **Reply #69 on:** August 21, 2006, 08:37:56 PM »

Just call me AE, but Torque needs to time the matches better or just post them all, I'm tired of waiting for something to happen.

Ph33r · « **Reply #70 on:** September 02, 2006, 03:40:48 AM »

Is there gonna be a SA version of this??

Psycho · « **Reply #71 on:** September 02, 2006, 07:54:04 AM »

I hope not... honestly... it would probably suck... the majority of us don't stunt SA anyway, including me and NoAPOlogies, so 3 will definitely not, but who knows, there may be one in the future...

OMG Torque edited my post.... o well...

Turtle Dick · « **Reply #72 on:** September 02, 2006, 08:03:56 AM »

First one was VC/LC and SA.
Second one is VC/LC only.
Third should be SA only.

Liviu · « **Reply #73 on:** September 02, 2006, 08:06:26 AM »

Quote from: Psycho

I hope not... honestly... it would probably suck... the majority of us don't stunt SA anyway, including me and NoAPOlogies, so 3 will definitely not, but who knows, there may be one in the future...

Hopefully not until HELL freezes over... I fucking hate San Andreas....

hahahahahahahaha

Torque · « **Reply #74 on:** September 02, 2006, 10:09:40 AM »

Hahahahha can you all be quiet. I've edited most of your posts to stop the result of conflict.