Author Topic: ROUND 3: mxz vs d.jAck  (Read 4433 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Kukiel

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 4980
    • View Profile
Re: ROUND 3: mxz vs d.jAck
« Reply #15 on: February 29, 2012, 11:07:06 AM »
Even if both of you are fucking bad song mixer, plus you mixed dubstep to dubstep, what a shame...
Seriously, what the fuck. I really liked d.jAck's editing but fuck me, using this font made it look as cheap as Vietnamese prostitute. Plus that music. Now, don't get me wrong. I'm not gonna judge basing on your music taste but certainly mixing dubstep with dubstep isn't impressive.
Mxz entry looked way more professional and even though he showed the stunt a time too much, he still had better cameras and effects.
Voting for mxz.

Offline XTO --

  • Board Mods
  • Posts: 4334
  • HUEHUEHEU
    • View Profile
Re: ROUND 3: mxz vs d.jAck
« Reply #16 on: February 29, 2012, 11:51:55 AM »
Even if both of you are fucking bad song mixer, plus you mixed dubstep to dubstep, what a shame...
Seriously, what the fuck. I really liked d.jAck's editing but fuck me, using this font made it look as cheap as Vietnamese prostitute. Plus that music. Now, don't get me wrong. I'm not gonna judge basing on your music taste but certainly mixing dubstep with dubstep isn't impressive.
Mxz entry looked way more professional and even though he showed the stunt a time too much, he still had better cameras and effects.
Voting for mxz.


This

Offline MxZz.

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 5653
  • Nomad Union
    • View Profile
    • MY YT CHANNEL
Re: ROUND 3: mxz vs d.jAck
« Reply #17 on: February 29, 2012, 11:53:18 AM »
Huh, celldweller dubstep? Okay.

Offline PtRvY

  • WH Crew
  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 4153
  • Wasteland Hero / BT Member
    • View Profile
Re: ROUND 3: mxz vs d.jAck
« Reply #18 on: February 29, 2012, 12:02:09 PM »
Huh, celldweller dubstep? Okay.
Indeed, Celldweller ain't dubstep. But that remix was a lil' dubsteppy. The original was nowhere near dubstep though :)

Offline Kukiel

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 4980
    • View Profile
Re: ROUND 3: mxz vs d.jAck
« Reply #19 on: February 29, 2012, 12:13:32 PM »
I was referring to d.jack's entry.

Offline Christian

  • Digital+
  • Posts: 2152
  • ~ exLective.
    • View Profile
    • exLective Prod.
Re: ROUND 3: mxz vs d.jAck
« Reply #20 on: March 01, 2012, 06:48:29 AM »
I dont want sound like a douche but Skrillex isn't dubstep tho. < Ignore that.
On the match: I really loved both of the entry's, they were great in every aspect and its pretty hard to vote here. Since I loved audio mixing a bit much I'll vote for him. Also great work d.Jack for mixing those two songs so good.

 

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal