Author Topic: [Sm]Draugr  (Read 4038 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline EabaetaebeaT

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 296
  • Blup
    • View Profile
Re: [Sm]Draugr
« Reply #30 on: December 15, 2009, 01:32:12 PM »
Well I'm not a VC guy at all and didn't stunt any long in it, but off from what I've seen it really looks like VC gives more possibilities. Take a look at the finishers of Trinity and Devour. Never gonna happen in the real SA - it just shows that the VC engine gives much better accelerations and top speeds compared to SA's. So the SAiVC guys got higher chances and more possiblities.

B2T now I guess. :ajaja:

 :blink: :neen: ever tryed to bump/p2bumpin vc? Sa has limits and it might hard to reach them... In vc you have too waste MUCH time to push the limits ... except csms maybe  :sleep:

Offline FIGHTER

  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 11259
    • View Profile
Re: [Sm]Draugr
« Reply #31 on: December 15, 2009, 01:56:22 PM »
Well I'm not a VC guy at all and didn't stunt any long in it, but off from what I've seen it really looks like VC gives more possibilities. Take a look at the finishers of Trinity and Devour. Never gonna happen in the real SA - it just shows that the VC engine gives much better accelerations and top speeds compared to SA's. So the SAiVC guys got higher chances and more possiblities.

B2T now I guess. :ajaja:
its pretty hard to land pecisons which are more easy in SA? dunno...

Offline dirtybird78

  • misSdirecti0n
  • V.I.P. Member
  • Posts: 83
  • Est. 2005
    • View Profile
Re: [Sm]Draugr
« Reply #32 on: December 15, 2009, 07:12:48 PM »

other then that some disappointing ones and mostly disappointed about the finisher that after all the build-up, i thought he gonna nail the top prec.


But good video,some nice stunts.the edit was ok,but too dark imo.

 

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal