Author Topic: Ramp to bump to precision  (Read 2938 times)

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Dan

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 2095
    • View Profile
Re: Ramp to bump to precision
« Reply #15 on: June 11, 2010, 08:21:11 AM »
Because the tops better and poss? Stunts should always been done to the better part, otherwise the spot is sort of ruined, someone was lazy when landing it

Offline TrYp

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 5055
  • X
    • View Profile
    • http://sampforum.hu
Re: Ramp to bump to precision
« Reply #16 on: June 11, 2010, 08:26:11 AM »
But it's still looking good, it doesn't mather that it's easier or not

Offline Daffy

  • V.I.P. Member
  • Posts: 13506
  • WH & NU Founder
    • View Profile
Re: Ramp to bump to precision
« Reply #17 on: June 11, 2010, 08:53:34 AM »
It would like look pure shit due to the fact the top should have been landed instead.

Offline TrYp

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 5055
  • X
    • View Profile
    • http://sampforum.hu
Re: Ramp to bump to precision
« Reply #18 on: June 11, 2010, 09:00:36 AM »
You guys are rushing perfection :rolleyes:

Offline Herb

  • Nothingness
  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 3840
  • I'm not living in Heaven, I'm living in Hell.
    • View Profile
Re: Ramp to bump to precision
« Reply #19 on: June 11, 2010, 09:07:26 AM »
You guys are rushing perfection :rolleyes:
How are they doing that if the top would be "perfection" of this spot, but the middle part would be half-assedness?

Offline Daffy

  • V.I.P. Member
  • Posts: 13506
  • WH & NU Founder
    • View Profile
Re: Ramp to bump to precision
« Reply #20 on: June 11, 2010, 09:08:18 AM »
No you're rushing lameness instead of being patient for perfection.
I guess for example could had just landed the lower part for SA Smackdown and it would still be as impressive in your book then, or are you starting to see my point?

Offline TrYp

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 5055
  • X
    • View Profile
    • http://sampforum.hu
Re: Ramp to bump to precision
« Reply #21 on: June 11, 2010, 09:40:51 AM »
Ok let's see another example. Devour finisher is landed to the roof and not to the precision, and it was still as impressive as for example SA Smackdown finisher in its time. Also everybody knows that the precision is possible and nobody was able to land it, and in my opinion nobody will in the near future. Enough discussion, let's go ontopic.

Offline Squeak

  • Forbidden Element
  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 2950
    • View Profile
Re: Ramp to bump to precision
« Reply #22 on: June 11, 2010, 10:02:22 AM »
you guys are just too serious, the higher part is just a stunt too, like the lower part.
i think every people here doing this just for fun, you shouldn't argue on this, land that part of this stunt whatever you want, may someone will do the higher part soon ;)

Offline Asaaj

  • Spaalonebabuguuscooties
  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 7336
    • View Profile
Re: Ramp to bump to precision
« Reply #23 on: June 11, 2010, 10:42:54 AM »
The fact that a stunt could have been executed better and is old by then is the thing that is laming it. I know everybody is stunting for fun but people should have common sense and patience when trying a stunt.  :ajaja:

Offline SnowMan

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 7125
  • Life is what you make it
    • View Profile
Re: Ramp to bump to precision
« Reply #24 on: June 12, 2010, 05:17:57 AM »
Lost the spot, I just hope none will lame it by landing the lower part now.

Why is it lame landing on the lower part? I guess it's also new.

to every challange that isnt really borin/lame you say they are, now you say the lower part, wich is fucking lame and crap when you can land the higher part it's not lame  :lol:

Offline ChriStunter

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 877
    • View Profile
Re: Ramp to bump to precision
« Reply #25 on: June 12, 2010, 05:52:06 AM »
landed the lower part but just deleted the rep

Offline Sear

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 2803
    • View Profile
Re: Ramp to bump to precision
« Reply #26 on: June 12, 2010, 06:27:35 AM »
Glad i lost that spot, was fucking horrible to try

 

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal