This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - stuntman
1
« on: December 13, 2011, 10:29:58 AM »
Not my style of liquid, but awesome production mate  .
Cheers dude, Thanks for the listen. 
2
« on: December 13, 2011, 10:06:52 AM »
well, you are using 4 cores in the benchmark, why do you care if it says 1, and about its performance, how when did you buy your computer ?, computers tend to show their age after 3 years or so, just like mine, i used to get 120 fps on SA when i first got it, now i barely get 80
Oh, So I am utilising all four cores? I assumed because it said 1 I was only using 1?
3
« on: December 12, 2011, 10:45:09 PM »
Thanks for all the help guys lol! 
4
« on: December 11, 2011, 03:24:22 PM »
Lol, CHeers mate. 
5
« on: December 11, 2011, 12:24:41 PM »
Can anyone help me please?
6
« on: December 11, 2011, 08:32:36 AM »
Okay, I went into msconfig, and advanced options on boot.ini. I changed the number of cores from 1 to 4, reran the benchmark, And the score improved by about a 1000. But it still says 1 core? Any ideas? Do I have to go into bios? 
7
« on: December 11, 2011, 08:25:00 AM »
Easy heads, I saw that benchmarking software in someone's post the other day, So I thought I would run it, I am starting to believe that I am not getting the most out of my computer. Is there anything not turned on or activated or something, Am I taking advantage of the four cores my pc is supposed to have? Don't get me wrong it's fast, I just think I am missing something? Any help is appreciated thanks. I just downloaded the free version, And my xp is 64 bit, So cant run that specific test. Why does it say "1" next to cores, When it's quad core? Excuse my ignorance here. 
9
« on: May 21, 2011, 06:04:05 AM »
I have sorted the interlacing shit now mate, What codec should I be using, I have forgot everything, The last time I was stunting and editing was about 3 year ago lol. Cheers for the advice dude. 
10
« on: May 19, 2011, 02:21:43 AM »
Cheers peeps, Glad you are feeling, I will post the link up for the album when it is released. 
11
« on: May 19, 2011, 01:44:04 AM »
I tried recording at 10fps, Then sped up like you said in vegas, The clip sped up ok and looked normal. But the quality became impaired and had nuff lines all the way down it, You will have to excuse my ignorence it's been so long since I did any editing, I have even forgot what settings I used to render at man. Can anyone help? Doing my head in lol, I might just have to get someone to edit a video for me when I have done all my stunts.
12
« on: May 17, 2011, 08:59:43 AM »
Record at 10fps in fraps, And speed up by 250 percent in vegas? I have not opened vegas for 3 years lol, This will be fun.
Yep. Just insert a 10 FPS clip into Vegas and right click on it. In the right click menu click on the bottom's field called "Properties...". In that window there's an option called "Playback rate:" with the stock amount of 1,000. Change that to 2,500 to gain the 25 FPS speed.
Make sure that the frame rate is also setted to 25 FPS in the project settings (File / Properties....) and it all should be fine.
@ Hakon: 15 x 1,666666666... = 24,99999999... so you'll ALWAYS have that unwatned blur thing. It's just 0,11111111... and not much noticeable, but longer videos got thousands of frames whereas that difference can cause problems on masks to give a great example.
Thanks mate.
13
« on: May 17, 2011, 08:40:53 AM »
Sick tracks. Loved all of them but I guess the best one for my ears was "lovesick" 
Cheers buddy.
14
« on: May 17, 2011, 08:32:27 AM »
Cheers mate.
15
« on: May 17, 2011, 07:38:04 AM »
Cheers for the replies guys, I will have to get a new card. So what do I do Rusch? Record at 10fps in fraps, And speed up by 250 percent in vegas? I have not opened vegas for 3 years lol, This will be fun.
|
Show Posts
.
