Ghost used that exact song on his entry in the SASL2 :lol:
Ghost used that exact song on his entry in the SASL2 :lol:
I know... it was all a plot to be able to post that song again and remind the people here of how awesome that clip of Ghost was.
Sick entry, however I don't believe perform = use, pretty sure you were supposed to navigate the harvester instead of involving it in a stunt.Perform =/= use, but more like make, do, produce, pull off. And it says 'with' so I could do anything with it and you can't deny that. Thanks though.
That's a good point, the wording really is ambiguous, but I think the proper wording for what you're interpreting would be "performed with the aid of/performed involving", as performed with seems very direct. But as I said, it is rather ambiguous, I think it'd be more clear to say "performed driving a combine harvester", although it isn't stylistically correct, it is way more clear. I hope the judges will agree with your point of view to avoid conflict & someone having wasted their time due to a "misinterpretation" of the objective.
Haha not that. When you look at how it is written, you'll get the fact it has more meanings. If it said 'performed in...' I'd understand that as driving the vehicle, but since it says 'performed with...' I take it as I can use the vehicle in any way. Also, I wouldn't be happy if you say my entry is corrupt just because of someone's imperfect english.That's a good point, the wording really is ambiguous, but I think the proper wording for what you're interpreting would be "performed with the aid of/performed involving", as performed with seems very direct. But as I said, it is rather ambiguous, I think it'd be more clear to say "performed driving a combine harvester", although it isn't stylistically correct, it is way more clear. I hope the judges will agree with your point of view to avoid conflict & someone having wasted their time due to a "misinterpretation" of the objective.
though you're right and i'm honestly thinking about being a little more precise with the formulation of these in the future, i gotta say... dude... he clearly knows what the objective means :lol: he just doesn't want this to be the day in history in which he performs something without an MTB :lol:
Haha not that. When you look at how it is written, you'll get the fact it has more meanings. If it said 'performed in...' I'd understand that as driving the vehicle, but since it says 'performed with...' I take it as I can use the vehicle in any way. Also, I wouldn't be happy if you say my entry is corrupt just because of someone's imperfect english.
To be fair, he asked me, and I told him that it says "with" a combine harvester. He performed a stunt "with" a combine harvester, just hung on a magnet instead of driven.
Lol, funny thing is that you answered "I can't help" when I asked you.To be fair, he asked me, and I told him that it says "with" a combine harvester. He performed a stunt "with" a combine harvester, just hung on a magnet instead of driven.
organisation, judges and creator of the objective... all these people could be asked for the precise meaning on this. instead asking a person that natively speaks english doesn't makeany sensealot of sense and its just cementing my point that he's trying to avoid stunting with the combine harvester.
it's obviously the core of the objective
Lol, funny thing is that you answered "I can't help" when I asked you.To be fair, he asked me, and I told him that it says "with" a combine harvester. He performed a stunt "with" a combine harvester, just hung on a magnet instead of driven.
organisation, judges and creator of the objective... all these people could be asked for the precise meaning on this. instead asking a person that natively speaks english doesn't makeany sensealot of sense and its just cementing my point that he's trying to avoid stunting with the combine harvester.
it's obviously the core of the objective